Has PDR created more problems than it solves?
No one is claiming that homes created through PDR will solve the housing crises, but 1.8 million new homes is not an inconsequential number. However, the nature of these homes has come under close scrutiny.
A 2020 study commissioned by the government found that homes created through PDRs resulted in “worse quality residential environments” than those that required LPA planning permission. Both the researchers of this report and the Housing Communities and Local Government Committee expressed concerns that some homes delivered through PDRs were of poor quality, in unsuitable places and not the type of housing actually needed.
When it comes to quality, by sidestepping the usual regulatory frameworks, PDR conversions often escape the rigorous checks designed to ensure homes are safe and
comfortable. Critically, they are exempt from Part O of Building Regulations, which addresses overheating in residential dwellings and aims to protect the health and wellbeing of occupants by reducing the occurrence of high indoor temperatures. This exemption leaves thousands of homes at risk, specifically those transformed from office buildings with sealed façades and extensive glazing—architectural legacies that can work against thermal comfort.
A 2023 survey on PDR housing and health published by UCL showed that only 63% of respondents were able to keep comfortably cool during hot summer weather and 14% cited a lack of fresh air in the dwelling to be a problem.
Insurance company Zurich UK states: “Office to flat conversions are at increased risk of serious overheating due to poor design, including a lack of appropriate ventilation and shading. The danger is greatest in tiny, self-contained bedsits and studio type flats that could potentially become uninhabitable during increasingly hot summers.”